top of page

Medieval Stone Heads/disability

From: Image on the Edge: The Margins of Medieval Art by Michael Camille

“Physiognomic mockery” (82)

“Scurrilous fools and twisted figures” (83)

“Both Wells and Semur are smallish structures, and their marginal images can be seen from ground-level quite easily. The soaring scale of many cathedrals, however, often makes it impossible to see the marginal sculpture from below, either within or outside the sacred structure. The deformed and base are ejected by being made invisible. But this did not prevent the carvers lavishing care on the minute delineation of the unseen.” (83)

“These later heads are completely human and so powerful in their physiognomic exactness that art historians have described them as portraits of the artisans who made them or as case histories of certain mental illnesses. Nowhere else in thirteenth-century sculpture does the carver get to display his skill at animating the human face, the slobbering mouth and the glinting eyes as he does here in these corner creations. Carved in the mason’s yard, these hidden faces, when fitted into place, were not visible from far below, suggesting that they were, perhaps, sites of practice. Skill was important to the carver, for we know from later documents that the cost of spoiled stones was taken out of their wages. In this sense the freedom they exhibited in this one type of undictated, unseen and unauthorized sculpture emerges as rage, jeering and tongue-showing that mocks the edifice and its authorities. (...) A side-show of abnormality and ugliness, unknown until photographers were able to scale the buildings on scaffolding a century ago, they are the most human, and the least divine, forms on the sacred edifice. Their liminal status…” (84)

Recent Posts

See All

In which the chicken survives

I recently read a story in a literary periodical – it doesn't really matter which story or which periodical – that introduced a chicken in the first paragraph. Though there was no hint of violence in

Internet Journal Journal

I like a lot of what I read in online literary journals. I also find it harder to read poetry and stories on the screen than on the printed page. I don’t find it impossible to read on the screen; it’s

Alexander the ______ (Donnelly, Newlove, Liem)

Miscited (see the note at the end): Donnelly, Timothy. The Problem of the Many. Wave Books (2022). Liem, T. Obits. Coach House (2015). Newlove, John. The Night the Dog Smiled. ECW (1984). I happened o


bottom of page